Leaders Think Gen Z Doesn’t Want to Work. Here’s Why They Are Wrong

Megan Gerhardt • March 2, 2023

The Headline Everyone Is Tired Of Reading: Gen Z Doesn’t Want To Work


In late January, the headline “Davos attendees can’t stop hating on Gen Z” appeared on my newsfeed. For some reason, these leaders think that Gen Z doesn’t want to work.

It was the daily story from the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum, so one would think they would have something more constructive to discuss.

I had been following the updates on Davos closer than I normally would, as the WEF has been a fantastic leader in research on creating age-friendly workplace climates. I was looking forward to hearing what might come from sharing that work. That meant the tired clickbait headline about Kids These Days was even more disappointing than usual.

headline

I did watch the YouTube clip where Bloomberg discussed how while the conversations at Davos start with “worldly concerns like climate change or the economy, everyone really just wants to complain about their young workers.”

A few days later, the Washington Post followed up the news with an article titled Hey Gen Z, It’s Not Good to Have Your Boss Hate You.

So the subtitle of my article is “Hey Everyone, You Are Misunderstanding Gen Z and Judging Them Inappropriately in Ways that Will Alienate Your Youngest Workers Indefinitely, and That’s Not Good. 




Enough of this “Gen Z doesn’t want to work” narrative. 

This kind of rhetoric keeps feeding this mythical generation war in the workplace. It’s tired and exactly what we did when the Millennials entered the workplace.

We saw generational norms different from what past generations had subscribed to. Then we judged those norms as wrong ones because we didn’t understand them. We didn’t like them either.  As a result, we alienated a generation. Let’s not do it again.

I’m not negating the frustration of not understanding a segment of your employees or the potential losses workplace experiences when there are misaligned norms on engagement or performance. These are important concerns!

However, I guarantee complaining about what’s wrong with Gen Z will not result in a motivation shift.

So what’s the solution?

We need a little Gentelligence here. (For those just joining this work already in progress, Gentelligence is about understanding the complexities and uniqueness of generational differences in the workplace and using them to create opportunities for intergenerational learning and collaboration).

By applying the 4 Gentelligence practices, what looks like an insurmountable challenge can become an important conversation to create that elusive engagement so many leaders are craving from Gen Z.



First, Practice 1: Identify Assumptions.

“Gen Z just doesn’t want to work.”  Beyond the broad brush used to characterize an entire generation, there’s another assumption you might not pick up on here. It’s one I have become more and more aware of the more generational consulting I do. I guarantee it will be a game-changer.

Those making this statement assume that Gen Z defines the concept of “work” the same way they do. That’s not how generational norms work.

Every generation learns the tools and norms they need to survive and thrive in their own time; the formative experiences they have growing up help shape how they see the world and their place in it. A generation collectively decides how they define success based on the social, cultural, economic, and political norms at work during their most impressionable years.

The popular jobs, the people that were most admired and who society holds up as role models as they grow up, and the things they see the prior generation doing that they both agree and disagree with combine to create generational norms.



Observations of Generational Differences

Through my work, I’ve come across so many concepts that we assume those younger and older than us see the same way we do:

  • Flexibility
  • Balance
  • Transparency
  • Communication
  • And of course…Work.

This is not a new phenomenon. Those of us in Gen X watched many of our Baby Boomer parents devote significant hours to careers (Baby Boomers coined the word “workaholic,” after all.) They defined success based largely on their position on the corporate ladder.

When we pushed back in favor of more work/life balance and a desire for more meaningful work, we were given that “slacker” nickname. It’s one that Gen X has never really been able to shake.

Millennials wanted opportunities at work earlier than prior generations, and we called them entitled.

Inherent in the current leadership lament about Gen Z not being willing to work is an assumption that they define “work” the same way their leaders do. Thus begins the miscommunications and misalignment.



Practice 2: Adjust the Lens. 

Once we’ve identified that potentially faulty assumption, it’s time to deploy practice 2.

We tend to see things through our lens (whether age-based or otherwise), often without realizing the lenses of others would show something entirely different and often quite fascinating. To paraphrase Walt Whitman, this is where we need to use curiosity instead of judgment. Here are some questions to get you started:

“I keep reading that leaders feel like Gen Z isn’t interested in working. What do you make of that?”

“When you think about the idea of work (or success, or career…), what does that mean to you? Do you think it means something different to people now than when I started my career?”



Practice 3: Build Trust

As a leader, one of your most essential jobs is creating an environment of psychological safety. If you haven’t come across this term yet, it means ensuring everyone on your team is comfortable with the following:

  • feels safe to speak up
  • take risks
  • ask for help

It’s not a term specific to generationally diverse teams but is particularly important to their success.

We tend to find that older team members are less comfortable asking for help than younger ones. Younger team members may be reluctant to speak up out of concern they will be seen as entitled. These barriers to psychological safety can get in the way of intergenerational learning and collaboration.

Using the momentum from the questions asked in practice 2, we can dig into the answers in a way that demonstrates to Gen Z that we care about their viewpoint. We can also demonstrate to the rest of the team and the organization as a whole that regardless of generation, we are committed to creating a workplace where everyone is engaged and committed to helping the team accomplish its shared mission.

Once we are more confident that everyone agrees on our mission, it’s easier to be open-minded that we all may have different views on how to get there.

A great way to proactively explore these dynamics is to create an intergenerational roundtable. A dedicated session that invites all employees to share their perspectives on the formidable challenges surrounding topics like quiet quitting and the Great Resignation.

With that invitation to share comes a requirement to listen as well. What important (and interesting) differences exist in how employees of different ages, generations, and career stages view the purpose of work? Where do we have more common ground than we realized?



Practice 4: Expand the Pie


The final practice involves moving away from the false dichotomy that for one generation to win, others must lose. It’s rooted in the perspective that our workplaces can benefit from an intergenerational workplace. The opposing view is viewing generational diversity like the plague.

Workplaces that can proactively and successfully create climates that respect diversity are more likely to have successful succession planning. There is research that supports this!

They also tap into different informational networks and leverage complementary skills. Lastly, they have more engaged employees who are less likely to leave.

The three prior practices are fundamental in creating these kinds of age-friendly climates. To go even further, create a mutual mentoring program. It’s my favorite Gentelligence tool. It normalizes the idea that all generations have something to teach as well as something to learn.

Bring together older employees interested in passing down their experience and developing new skills with younger ones. Particularly, those eager to learn from decades of experience. Additionally, there is motivation to share their perspectives and different ways of approaching work.

I have the privilege of working with Gen Z every day. It allows me to add a few things to the sentence “Gen Z doesn’t want to work…”

Gen Z doesn’t want to work for people who are judging them for growing up in a different time and way.

Gen Z doesn’t want to work if it means they lose agency, interest, or engagement with what matters most to them.

Gen Z doesn’t want to work the exact same way everyone else does, and that should be seen as fascinating and important, not as wrong.


By Megan Gerhardt February 13, 2026
It has been said that everything old becomes new again on a long enough timeline. There's a fascinating generational trend I've been seeing among younger Gen Zs and the oldest of Gen A (Note: I am not calling that generation Gen Alpha, because that name is nonsensical and outdated already, and that generation is barely in their teens. More on that soon)--a craving for low-tech, no-tech, screen-free experiences. Gentelligence focuses primarily on generational dynamics in the workplace, and I do predict this will have implications for where and how these generations want to work. Despite the chaos surrounding back-to-office policies and experiments, our youngest members of the workplace (and our soon-to-be newest employees) are showing signs that they value time away from screens. I first noticed this last year among my own students, who were overwhelmingly setting change goals in my change management class focused on reducing screen time. Versions included "cleaning up my sleep routine" (putting the phone away at least 30 minutes before bed, eliminating blue light before bed, reading physical books), "reduce my weekly screentime", "stop doomscrolling", and "impose limits on TikTok and Instagram time". It was a sign that it was no longer just their parents or older generations who wanted them off their phones; they wanted themselves off their phones, too. For a wave of young people raised in an era of tech overload, it seems we have reached the point of maximum saturation, and they are pushing back. As one of my students astutely mentioned to me last year, "There are no boundaries now...our generation is just trying to figure out how to put some of them back." I've doubled down on the need for this in my teaching, having conversations with students about how to ethically use AI as a thought-partner while balancing protected time for our most scarce resource these days: deep thinking and connection. It was this need, coupled with the overwhelming research showing the improved retention and learning that occurs when students handwrite their notes and put away their laptops in class, that led me to declare our classroom a laptop and phone-free zone. We still use slides to guide conversations, but there are no longer 30 laptop screens popped up in front of them, distracting even those who are trying hard to focus. Surprisingly, I've had very little pushback. I was concerned they would feel like I was forcing them backwards, but collectively we seem to be exhaling. The discussions have never been better. As our younger Gen Zs reach young adulthood and our oldest Gen As become teenagers, they are emerging from a kind of social experiment they entered unwittingly — a life that has never known a world without constant screens. They are realizing how different they feel when they unplug. Gen Z and Gen A even have a term for this: touching grass. That's right, when the default is constant tech immersion, they had to come up with a phrase to represent the intentional effort it takes to step away. Whenever possible, I try to engage in some real-time generational anthropology, just to explore my hunches and (when possible) debunk stereotypes. Gentelligence is all about being curious rather than judgmental, and I am most definitely curious about these early signs that our younger generations are seeking a better balance between their tech and non-tech worlds. Last month, I was in Chicago for a keynote and found myself in a trendy food hall over lunch. There were little shops surrounding the food hall, including one of my all-time weaknesses, a stationery store . Pens! Journals! Paper! Notebooks! (I, too, love the analog. After indulging myself in a number of vital paper goods, I was tucking into a sandwich in the food hall and saw a (literally) noteworthy sight: a table of early 20-somethings, gathering on their lunch hour and...writing in their journals. Multi-colored pens, stamps, and conversation were plentiful. There was not a phone in sight. That in and of itself was remarkable. It turns out that stationary stores are experiencing a resurgence . Knitting, crocheting, embroidery, and sourdough baking are also all having a moment. Physical books ( and bookstores! ) are making a comeback. A few weeks later, I was at another event, this time a very trendy commercial interior design conference, where we were discussing ways to design spaces that promote intergenerational interactions (yes, it was as cool as you might be thinking). I saw a young designer at the cocktail hour and walked over to introduce myself. I asked if I could pick her brain on something, as I figured it was part of her JOB to be up on the latest trends. I asked her whether she was feeling a personal pull to use less tech, or if this was something she had seen among her peers. That's when she told me about Analog Bags . (I won't go down that rabbit hole here, but feel free to explore the link and know that I am absolutely creating my own Analog Bag as we speak). At that same design conference, a book was recommended to me: Megatrends by John Naisbett. The gentleman who suggested it said it changed his life. He thought I would find it interesting, given my interest in generational trends, behavioral cycles, and, of course, my classes in change management. I ordered it as soon as I got back to my hotel room (fun fact: it was published in 1982, so you'll have to find a vintage copy!). I've been devouring it, and among the many eye-opening insights was the observation that " the more 'High Tech' we become, the more we need 'High Touch.” Now, Naisbett was referring to the high-tech era of the early 1980s, when personal computers were entering the scene, but the relevance of the comment almost 45 years later, in the age of AI, was not lost on me. Those who have lived their entire lives as products of high-tech are now blazing the trail to meet their need for high touch. Let this be my formal declaration (for whatever it's worth) that I predict our youngest generations will lead us back to a balance between tech and high-touch: they are the proverbial canaries in the coal mine, and their message is clear. They are living, breathing embodiments of a life flooded with endless tech, fake news, constant connectivity, dopamine hits, and input dictated by algorithms, and it appears they may have had enough.
By Megan Gerhardt January 12, 2026
What if every generation is trying to be respectful, but what that means is entirely different depending on when you grew up?
By Megan Gerhardt November 16, 2025
Explores how AI thinks different generations write emails
By Megan Gerhardt September 12, 2025
Curse of Knowledge: experts can't imagine not knowing what they know. In workplaces, generations assume others share their experience, causing miscommunication.
By Megan Gerhardt August 31, 2025
Maybe i do too.
By Megan Gerhardt July 13, 2025
It wasn't a planned comment.
By Megan Gerhardt May 19, 2025
I've always loved invisible ink.
By Megan Gerhardt May 6, 2025
the plot thickens.
By Megan Gerhardt April 10, 2025
The difference between multigenerational workforce and intergenerational workforce and why it matters.
By Megan Gerhardt March 25, 2025
Here's the thing about water.