Then + Now

Megan Gerhardt • July 13, 2025

It wasn't a planned comment.


"We need to replace now versus then with now plus then. That's the magic formula." 


This was my response to an audience question at a recent keynote. The participant, a 40-something Gen Xer, had asked what to do when they felt stuck mediating between their younger and older colleagues when it came down to upholding past processes or inventing new ones.  Our five-generation workforce spans more of an age range than we've ever seen before, and those of us in the middle of our careers (currently most Gen X and Millennials) often find ourselves wedged between The Way We've Always Done It and The New Way to Think About It.


Gentelligence calls this Expanding the Pie (practice #4). It's a mindset shift to help us change the narrative we have about working across generations. Too often, we think we are in a tug of war with those who have started their careers significantly before or after we have, and when we frame it this way, someone will always appear to be on the losing side. Any gain on our end means a corresponding loss on yours, leading us to operate from a sense of scarcity and threat. We become defensive, digging in our heels and protecting our positions, and no progress is made in either direction.


But let's re-imagine this tug of war. Rather than Gen Zs squaring off against Boomers (with Gen X and Millennials playing referee) move everyone to the same side of that rope. The opponent is the problem we are trying to solve, not each other. Now our different perspectives and ideas can be seen as things that can all potentially help us win, and this reframing opens up an entirely new set of possibilities for innovation and collaboration. 


The way we've always done it likely contains some important wisdom and value. Is it possible that value could be amplified or better understood by integrating a new element or refreshing the way we use it? That new approach being advocated by younger employees may be a total game changer, but might lack organizational relevance without input from those who've been around a long time and better understand the broader context of the organization and its' systems.


It's just a nudge: suggest replacing the "vs" with an "and". Let me know what happens.





How Can They Not Understand That? Making the Implicit, Explicit

By Megan Gerhardt • May 19, 2025
I've always loved invisible ink.

Why Gen Needs to End That Text With an Emoji (haha, lol)

By Megan Gerhardt • May 6, 2025
the plot thickens.

Is Your Workplace Multi-Generational or Intergenerational? It Matters

By Megan Gerhardt • April 10, 2025
The difference between multigenerational workforce and intergenerational workforce and why it matters.

Generational Fish

By Megan Gerhardt • March 25, 2025
Here's the thing about water.
diverse students

3 Things HR Must Do to Build Gentelligence

By Megan Gerhardt • February 9, 2025
Is a multigenerational workforce an opportunity or a threat? It might be up to HR. Research is clear on this: it depends on how that age diversity is managed and the workplace culture that surrounds it. Really. That is the linchpin on all of this, which means it’s entirely up to your organization to do what it takes to turn what most see as frustration into an incredibly valuable human capital asset.
seveal yard sticks together

What Happens When We Shame & Judge a Generation For Growing Up in a Completely Different Time?

By Megan Gerhardt • January 5, 2025
The phrase “milestones of adulthood” paints maturity as an objective concept anchored in the rites of passage of marrying, purchasing a home, and having children. Yes, for past generations, those have been common benchmarks that occur as one passes through life, but the article is based on what I consider a number of flawed premises. First, the assumption that not checking those boxes represents some personal failure and symbolizes a lack of maturity. Second, the assumption we are anchored to a static definition of growing up and adulthood.
outline of a lightening bolt on a piece of paper on a clipboard with moody desk lamp lighting

Reframe: Say This, Not That When Navigating Generational Differences @ Work

By Megan Gerhardt • November 19, 2024
My latest is a simple reframe, a tactic to help with our second Gentelligence practice, Adjusting the Lens. I try to avoid scripts, as there’s no one best way to lead or manage people, regardless of generation. But in the spirit of jumpstarting a smarter intergenerational conversation, I present a few Gentelligence phrases for you to try instead of judgment.
No vacancy

Thank You, Next…We’ll Wait for the Next Generation Instead

By Megan Gerhardt • October 31, 2024
If you don’t want to hire Gen Z (that’s an entire generation made up of 69.3 million people in the United States alone) then I’m not sure what the talent strategy is here. Skip over 15 years of workforce? Is the plan to wait for the next generation because you don’t like this one?
fingers pointing at a Z

Who You Gonna Call? Crossing the Streams of Gen Z and the Boomers at Work

By Megan Gerhardt • September 28, 2024
The norms Gen Z is bringing to the workplace are a product of many interacting realities, not the least of which was a global pandemic that impacted education, development, and upended workplace practices everywhere. This is our first generation to begin their careers in a hybrid/remote/post-COVID/mid-AI world of work. Do they have things to learn and improve upon? Of course. Is name calling and alienating them a good way to build the trust needed to teach them? Again, no.
green postit notes with happy and sad faces drawn on them.

Building Healthy Generational Workplaces

By Megan Gerhardt • September 4, 2024
Here’s the most practical generational expertise I can offer: if you want collaboration and learning across generations, you must build a workplace culture that supports it.