Age-Based Microaggressions: The One Phrase You Need to Squash Them

Megan Gerhardt • January 23, 2023

Have you ever thought about age-based microaggressions?


Microaggression | mi·cro·ag·gres·sion
/ˈmīkrōəˌɡreSHən/
noun

a statement, action, or incident regarded as an instance of indirect, subtle, or unintentional discrimination against members of a marginalized group


Last fall I was on a call with a client preparing for an upcoming workshop. I asked them to share examples of age or generational challenges from their organization. They collected anonymous input from their employees on the subject, and as they shared the results, a theme emerged; seemingly little things that were resulting in ongoing significant tension. One example was from a young female employee who reported her older male boss addressed all emails to her team “Dear Girls” or “Hey Kids”.


As we talked more, I realized these were age-based microaggressions. Most of what we hear about microaggressions tends to focus on how they occur related to differences in race or sexual orientation. But, they can exist around any marginalized group. Can you think of others?


Psychology Today defines a microaggression as, “the everyday verbal, nonverbal, and environmental slights, snubs, or insults, whether intentional or unintentional, which communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative messages to target persons based solely upon their marginalized group membership. In many cases, these hidden messages may invalidate the group identity or experiential reality of target persons, demean them on a personal or group level, communicate they are lesser human beings, suggest they do not belong with the majority group, threaten and intimidate, or relegate them to inferior status and treatment.”

A quick search found very little out there written about age-based microaggressions. I found a few short pieces and a very well-done piece in The Gerontologist (specifically about age-related microaggressions against older adults) but not much else.

So let’s get into it here. I’ve been on a bit of a mission to collect examples since this showed up on my radar screen several months ago. I’ve brought it up in a few interviews I’ve done. I’m also trying to drop the term into more conversations to spur discussion.


Here are a few examples of age based microaggressions from my current collection:

“Hi Girls…” (or “Hey kids…”)


“You’re so hardworking (for your age)”


“Maybe we shouldn’t give that project to John, he might have trouble learning the new technology.”


A job ad that wants to hire a “recent college grad.”


Calling older people “hun” or “adorable”


Saying an older job applicant wouldn’t be a good “cultural fit.”


According to Kevin Nadal, professor of psychology at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, “The difference between microaggressions and overt discrimination or macroaggressions, is that people who commit microaggressions might not even be aware of them.”


First, let’s set the stage for the different ways microaggressions can surface.

Microaggressions can take 3 three forms:


Age Based Microaggression 1: The Microassault


Overt and deliberate, subtle or explicit, these often take the form of biased attitudes or behaviors.  Microassaults are intentional and convey the message that members of the group in question are “lesser” in some way.



I’ll lead with an obvious one here…OK Boomer?


Back in 2019, I wrote a piece for NBC News on the impact of OK Boomer, not just on those it is said to, but its overall impact on preventing Gentelligence in how we frame intergenerational collaborations.


We can also substitute “entitled Millennial”, “Gen Z snowflake”, or “Gen X slacker” for “OK Boomer”. They all make the same point.



Age Based Microagression 2: The Microinsult

These are messages that are more subtle or indirect than a microassault, but still intend to deliver a clear message of rudeness or play into tired stereotypes or tropes, resulting in an insult to the group in question.


Are you an intern?


You must be about ready to retire, huh?


or “You’re about the same age as my granddaughter!”


Job listings that state the company is “looking for a youthful, energetic, agile worker to join our team.” may be embedding microinsults right into their job search process. Speaking more slowly (or more loudly) to older employees is another example of a microinsult. The Journal of  Nonverbal  Behavior found that younger people speak more slowly and in high-pitched voices when addressing older people than when talking to younger ones.



Age Based Microaggression 3: The Microinvalidation


This type is are often even harder to detect, but the key element here is “invalidation“. Any messaging or cues that undermine or try to negate the experience or viewpoints of an age-based group as not accurate, relevant, important, or valid would fit under the umbrella of microinvalidation.


A senior partner taking undeserved ownership of the work or ideas of a younger associate (while common in many corporate cultures) may qualify as an age-based microinvalidation, especially if others are aware of who did the work and also do not speak up.


Another example of microinvalidation toward younger people?


“You’re too young to be a ______” (insert respected position here: doctor, vice president, astrophysicist, manager…).


Microinvalidations toward older people often involve negating issues of age discrimination as a misunderstanding or a joke. Other examples might involve brushing off their input as lacking relevance because “they won’t be here much longer”.



Do age based microaggressions really matter? Yes.

Research suggests that those who experience microaggressions can experience substantial negative outcomes. These can range from poorer physical health, increased anxiety and stress, decreased in self-esteem, as well as loss of trust. We know that poorly managed generational and age diversity can damage teams, prevent succession planning, decay employee engagement, and lead to higher turnover.


Microaggressions of any kind keep us in the tired space of generational and age-based tension and bias and prevent us from realizing the benefits of Gentelligence®. That is realizing complementary expertise and strengths, tapping into different information networks and types of knowledge, innovation, and better decision-making.


Gentelligence® requires us to raise our awareness of the seemingly small but dangerous messages and actions of microaggressions from ourselves and from others. Here’s where we can lean into the wisdom of how to combat microaggressions against other kinds of differences. But we can also apply it to these age-based transgressions. Here’s my favorite strategy. I encourage you all to try it!


  • Can you help me understand what you mean by that?” This is my favorite strategy because “Can you help me understand” is already a golden phrase in Gentelligence work. It’s linked to Adjust the Lens (Gentelligence® Practice #2) and uses the wonderful strategy of curiosity over judgment, which is more likely to keep everyone’s defenses down.


Them: “I’ll just never understand your generation.”


You:  “Can you help me understand what you mean by that?


According to HBR, “Acknowledge that you accept their intentions to be as they stated but reframe the conversation around the impact of the microaggression. Explain how you initially interpreted it and why. If they continue to assert that they “didn’t mean it like that,” remind them that you appreciate their willingness to clarify their intent and hope they appreciate your willingness to clarify their impact.”


I’m still studying this issue, so reach out with more examples if you have them!


By Megan Gerhardt February 13, 2026
It has been said that everything old becomes new again on a long enough timeline. There's a fascinating generational trend I've been seeing among younger Gen Zs and the oldest of Gen A (Note: I am not calling that generation Gen Alpha, because that name is nonsensical and outdated already, and that generation is barely in their teens. More on that soon)--a craving for low-tech, no-tech, screen-free experiences. Gentelligence focuses primarily on generational dynamics in the workplace, and I do predict this will have implications for where and how these generations want to work. Despite the chaos surrounding back-to-office policies and experiments, our youngest members of the workplace (and our soon-to-be newest employees) are showing signs that they value time away from screens. I first noticed this last year among my own students, who were overwhelmingly setting change goals in my change management class focused on reducing screen time. Versions included "cleaning up my sleep routine" (putting the phone away at least 30 minutes before bed, eliminating blue light before bed, reading physical books), "reduce my weekly screentime", "stop doomscrolling", and "impose limits on TikTok and Instagram time". It was a sign that it was no longer just their parents or older generations who wanted them off their phones; they wanted themselves off their phones, too. For a wave of young people raised in an era of tech overload, it seems we have reached the point of maximum saturation, and they are pushing back. As one of my students astutely mentioned to me last year, "There are no boundaries now...our generation is just trying to figure out how to put some of them back." I've doubled down on the need for this in my teaching, having conversations with students about how to ethically use AI as a thought-partner while balancing protected time for our most scarce resource these days: deep thinking and connection. It was this need, coupled with the overwhelming research showing the improved retention and learning that occurs when students handwrite their notes and put away their laptops in class, that led me to declare our classroom a laptop and phone-free zone. We still use slides to guide conversations, but there are no longer 30 laptop screens popped up in front of them, distracting even those who are trying hard to focus. Surprisingly, I've had very little pushback. I was concerned they would feel like I was forcing them backwards, but collectively we seem to be exhaling. The discussions have never been better. As our younger Gen Zs reach young adulthood and our oldest Gen As become teenagers, they are emerging from a kind of social experiment they entered unwittingly — a life that has never known a world without constant screens. They are realizing how different they feel when they unplug. Gen Z and Gen A even have a term for this: touching grass. That's right, when the default is constant tech immersion, they had to come up with a phrase to represent the intentional effort it takes to step away. Whenever possible, I try to engage in some real-time generational anthropology, just to explore my hunches and (when possible) debunk stereotypes. Gentelligence is all about being curious rather than judgmental, and I am most definitely curious about these early signs that our younger generations are seeking a better balance between their tech and non-tech worlds. Last month, I was in Chicago for a keynote and found myself in a trendy food hall over lunch. There were little shops surrounding the food hall, including one of my all-time weaknesses, a stationery store . Pens! Journals! Paper! Notebooks! (I, too, love the analog. After indulging myself in a number of vital paper goods, I was tucking into a sandwich in the food hall and saw a (literally) noteworthy sight: a table of early 20-somethings, gathering on their lunch hour and...writing in their journals. Multi-colored pens, stamps, and conversation were plentiful. There was not a phone in sight. That in and of itself was remarkable. It turns out that stationary stores are experiencing a resurgence . Knitting, crocheting, embroidery, and sourdough baking are also all having a moment. Physical books ( and bookstores! ) are making a comeback. A few weeks later, I was at another event, this time a very trendy commercial interior design conference, where we were discussing ways to design spaces that promote intergenerational interactions (yes, it was as cool as you might be thinking). I saw a young designer at the cocktail hour and walked over to introduce myself. I asked if I could pick her brain on something, as I figured it was part of her JOB to be up on the latest trends. I asked her whether she was feeling a personal pull to use less tech, or if this was something she had seen among her peers. That's when she told me about Analog Bags . (I won't go down that rabbit hole here, but feel free to explore the link and know that I am absolutely creating my own Analog Bag as we speak). At that same design conference, a book was recommended to me: Megatrends by John Naisbett. The gentleman who suggested it said it changed his life. He thought I would find it interesting, given my interest in generational trends, behavioral cycles, and, of course, my classes in change management. I ordered it as soon as I got back to my hotel room (fun fact: it was published in 1982, so you'll have to find a vintage copy!). I've been devouring it, and among the many eye-opening insights was the observation that " the more 'High Tech' we become, the more we need 'High Touch.” Now, Naisbett was referring to the high-tech era of the early 1980s, when personal computers were entering the scene, but the relevance of the comment almost 45 years later, in the age of AI, was not lost on me. Those who have lived their entire lives as products of high-tech are now blazing the trail to meet their need for high touch. Let this be my formal declaration (for whatever it's worth) that I predict our youngest generations will lead us back to a balance between tech and high-touch: they are the proverbial canaries in the coal mine, and their message is clear. They are living, breathing embodiments of a life flooded with endless tech, fake news, constant connectivity, dopamine hits, and input dictated by algorithms, and it appears they may have had enough.
By Megan Gerhardt January 12, 2026
What if every generation is trying to be respectful, but what that means is entirely different depending on when you grew up?
By Megan Gerhardt November 16, 2025
Explores how AI thinks different generations write emails
By Megan Gerhardt September 12, 2025
Curse of Knowledge: experts can't imagine not knowing what they know. In workplaces, generations assume others share their experience, causing miscommunication.
By Megan Gerhardt August 31, 2025
Maybe i do too.
By Megan Gerhardt July 13, 2025
It wasn't a planned comment.
By Megan Gerhardt May 19, 2025
I've always loved invisible ink.
By Megan Gerhardt May 6, 2025
the plot thickens.
By Megan Gerhardt April 10, 2025
The difference between multigenerational workforce and intergenerational workforce and why it matters.
By Megan Gerhardt March 25, 2025
Here's the thing about water.